source

Delve deeper into the Moon and its secrets than ever before. The Bungie developers discuss the iconic lunar locale. 🌑 https://t.co/lgMW0IqHoD pic.twitter.com/Yyt74h1aPc — Bungie (@Bungie) July 18, 2019

Well, think I’m done with Dropbox now. I switched all my stuff to iCloud Drive quite a while ago, so I really have no need to have it on my computers anymore. source

source

.

.

. source

I stuck all those #DoodlesToGuns together and put them all into a Twitter Moment for easier viewing! I stopped counting but there's like 50 of 'em... Thank you to those who took part, supported with kind words, or simply clicked like 💙https://t.co/HkvUz4t0mt pic.twitter.com/v1A5cZGSdy — Ben (@PlainBen) July 14, 2019

.

Namaste Guardians pic.twitter.com/cz9fValo8A — Gigz (@Gigz) July 12, 2019

source

.

Jeremy Hsu writing for Scientific American So Pluribus instead deployed its depth-limited search, which considers how opponents might choose among only four general betting strategies: the precomputed blueprint, one biased toward folding, another biased toward calling and a fourth biased toward raising. This modified search helps explain why Pluribus’s success in six-player poker required relatively minimal computing resources and memory in comparison with past superhuman achievements in gaming AIs. Specifically, during live poker play, Pluribus ran on a machine with just two central CPUs and 128 gigabytes of memory. “It’s amazing this can be done at all, and second, that it can be done with no $&graphics processing units$& and no extreme hardware,” Sandholm says. By comparison, DeepMind’s famous AlphaGo program used 1,920 CPUs and 280 GPUs during its 2016 matches against top professional Go player Lee Sedol.

Hello!🙃 I'm Jessica and this is my passion!😊🖌️ 💪🏽#PortfolioDay pic.twitter.com/IbXDsZz5N7 — Painthisice(🇩🇪) (@Painthisice) July 10, 2019

Sean Hollister writing for The Verge Even if you say “no” to one app when it asks for permission to see those personally identifying bits of data, it might not be enough: a second app with permissions you have approved can share those bits with the other one or leave them in shared storage where another app — potentially even a malicious one — can read it. The two apps might not seem related, but researchers say that because they’re built using the same software development kits (SDK), they can access that data, and there’s evidence that the SDK owners are receiving it. It’s like a kid asking for dessert who gets told “no” by one parent, so they ask the other parent.